Soundcheck: An interview with "formerly famous" music critic John Mendels(s)ohn

johnmendelssohn030308.jpgBack at the end of January, Isthmus published a front page story about "How We Sound" – a review of the Madison music scene by John Mendels(s)ohn, a self-described "formerly famous music critic." The article sparked eleven angry pages of discussion on Isthmus’ website, thedailypage.com, and six letters to the editor. Although some people praised Mendels(s)ohn, most lambasted him.

"That article tasted like a shitty omelet that has a little bit of every possible ingredient from the inside door of the fridge," wrote one person. Another blasted, "What the FUCK kind of failed rockstar-cum-critic retard spells his name with a parenthetical letter?"

Well, let’s find out.

California native John Mendels(s)ohn, 60, has written for a variety of magazines, most famously Rolling Stone (and less famously for Chic, “Hustler’s slightly less respectable sister publication”). He’s also written books about the Kinks, the Pixies and Kate Bush. His book about the Pixies garnered withering criticism on amazon.com (“If I could burn one book, this would be it,” wrote one reviewer).

Mendels(s)ohn moved recently to Madison from London, where he had been living with his wife for five years. With their marriage currently in limbo, he’s carving out a new life for himself and soliciting work wherever he can. Locally, he’s written for the Wisconsin State Journal, Isthmus and Madison Magazine. After a frustrated attempt to start a theatre company in town, he’s also hoping to perform a one-man show at Restaurant Magnus sometime in April. (It would highlight his experiences in the coked-up offices of Chic in the early 80s.)

I recently met with Mendels(s)ohn at a downtown coffee shop. He showed up wearing a Honeymooners T-shirt and talked for almost two hours. He embodies an odd combination of balls-to-the-wall confidence, sincere self-deprecation and “beg-your-pardon” politeness.

What were you like in high school?

It was wretched until senior year. I’m good at loneliness, isolation and boredom. I’m saying it sort of flippantly, but it’s absolutely true. It’s been tough moving to a city on my own to carve out a life for myself. I’m not the sort of person who strikes up conversations with strangers. As a child, they supposed something was wrong with me. I was eight before I learned to ride a two-wheeler, 15 before I learned to swim. My mother was a neurotic, lonely, painful person and she taught me her worldview. I wasn’t a Cub Scout or anything like that. I loved sports but I was really bad at them. I won the school creative writing contest every year in junior high, but I can’t begin to tell you how little that counted.

How did you get your start writing?

I had written a review of Led Zeppelin for the student newspaper in college. I couldn’t stand Led Zeppelin. So, I sent Rolling Stone the same review. They printed it by virtue of the fact that I think they received 150 reviews that said, “This is the greatest thing ever!” and I said, “No, I don’t like this much.” So, they went with the unusual approach.

Didn’t you review Abby Road when it first came out?

I was thrilled by that. To review a Beatles album for Rolling Stone was all anyone could ever aspire to. I was just a kid in a little apartment on Venice Beach. I think the Beatles were at their best pre-1965. When they became self-conscious and arty, a lot of the vitality and excitement of it was lost. But I gave it a fairly glowing review.

Christopher+Milkcover030308.jpgHow did your career move from there?

At that time, the record industry was changing. It had been dominated by people in matching white plastic belts and white plastic loafers who listened to Frank Sinatra in their Cadillacs. When they discovered that a large percentage of what they were selling was this music that they didn’t even begin to understand, they began looking for young people to work for them who could explain it to them. I really loved the Kinks. Their label hired me to work for them, so I was writing ads and things. I was making a lot of money, driving a Porsche, buying clothes from the same tailor as Rod Steward. I was on top of the world. I had my own group, Christopher Milk. And that failed ignominiously. Our one claim to fame was that we were the only American group produced by Chris Thomas, a famous English producer who produced the Sex Pistols, Elton John, Paul McCartney and Pete Townshend. I mistakenly believed that I could always come back to being a famous writer. I discovered that I was mistaken and that I couldn’t go back to being a famous writer. And since then my life has been trying to regain what I had.

Since when?

Oh, since 1975, something like that.

But you’ve written books.

There’s no comparison. If you liked rock’n’roll, you read Rolling Stone. Period. And it might have been all you read, because they didn’t have any competition. If you were a Rolling Stone writer, it was really something special. Nothing compares.

What do you think of it now?

It’s not remotely the same. It’s really dull. At the time that I was writing for it...is ‘confluence’ the right word? All these circumstances came together. You had this phenomenon where people hadn’t written seriously about pop music before. You had all this fervor and all these talented, passionate people, many of whom were extremely drug-addled, which in many ways ruined them but in other ways inspired flights of fancy. Things weren’t corporate and controlled then. There was a lot of wildness and off-the-wall-ness that doesn’t exist anymore.

You don’t think that exists anywhere now?

I’m sure it does. There’s probably thousands of websites you could go to, where people are passionate and funny and insightful. But Rolling Stone had this unique position. Without internet, you couldn’t get online and discover things for yourself. You had to go out and buy Rolling Stone.

pixies030308.jpgWhat happened with the Pixies book?

I don’t think it’s bad at all. I did the book because nobody else on the list (that my editor gave me) was very interesting. I sincerely wanted to write a really nice biography – a journalistic biography with lots and lots of interviews. I wrote the Pixies’ management and the guy seemed very enthusiastic about the idea. What happened was, after the initial enthusiastic response, the manager pulled the plug on me and said, “We don’t want to do it.” I was now in the position of delivering the book without their cooperation. Which meant I had to do what I hadn’t wanted to do in the first place, which is write a critical history of the Pixies. The more I listened to them, the more I hated it. I couldn’t bear that music. Anyone who does enjoy it, my hat’s off to you. I envy you if you get pleasure from that music. I could have lied about it and tried to think of good things to say, but the music annoyed me so much, the book wound up as a sarcasm-fest. The editor let me flesh out the biography with short fictional stories that alternated with the critical/biographical chapters. I invented this character who was a Pixies fan, and told her story from late adolescence to middle age. I’m proud of those stories. It really annoyed Pixies fans because I denigrated their group. I don’t think they worked very hard to find merit in the fictional part. I was trying to understand what people liked about the Pixies – I was trying to see the world through their eyes.

Why did you move to Madison?

This painful frustration (of getting no work) in London just showed no signs of abating. I was there five years and it felt like five years of banging my head against the wall. I do genuinely, honestly think that I’m a better writer than a lot of the people who are getting regularly published in London. Mostly I was desperate to get out the U.K., so anywhere would have done. My sister lives in Kenosha, and she’d mentioned that Madison’s really nice. Now, I might leave soon. I mean, it’s gratifying having articles in the Isthmus, but I hate this snow.

What do you think about Madison?

I think parts of it are quite beautiful. Someone once told me, "The Midwest doesn’t much like ostentation." I like that about people, especially coming from L.A. But there is this sort of preciousness about Madison. People here seem fairly parochial and defensive. This "if you can’t say something nice, don’t say anything at all" attitude seems fairly widespread. I could have a 98 percent positive impression of the city. Does that mean I’m not entitled to remark on the two percent I don’t like? Making nice and coddling makes for extremely dull writing and criticism.

What about the reaction to your article in Isthmus about the local music scene? Your article got a heated response.

A lot of people seemed to take it perfectly straight. I was making fun of myself (in my bio). I can’t think of anything duller than a recitation of my credentials, so I made it self-mocking. I think it’s funnier that way. I mean, I did have a conversation with Jimi Hendrix once. It was a two-line conversation at the Whiskey a GoGo in Los Angeles, a couple months before his death. I had a three foot long red fringe on my jacket, a la Sly and the Family Stone. He said "Nice jacket, man," and I said "Thanks."

Is it hard for you to hear all this criticism of your writing?

No, I don’t think so. To be honest, I think people write because they enjoy attention. I won’t deny that that’s the case with me, too. I did do some writing in London and nobody ever said anything at all, nobody ever noticed. It’s gratifying to be noticed. People seem to think that I was saying there was a lot of mediocre music in Madison. Well, of course there is. There’s a lot of mediocre music in London, in Los Angeles. Most of the arts everywhere are mediocre, by definition. That’s why the people who do it well are paid astronomically well.

But Britney Spears is paid astronomically well, and I wouldn’t consider her the best singer.

You’re absolutely right. Sometimes some completely unlikely person just walks through the door at exactly the right moment and gets to be a movie star. I think that might be one of the key realizations of adulthood, when you find out life is not a meritocracy. Why is Madonna a popular recording artist? Why is Adam Sandler a movie star? These people are really loathsome.

What music have you been listening to lately?

Well, I’ve been listening to the Blueheels because I like them. Mostly, I don’t listen to music. This is going to sound terribly pretentious, but I listen to my own music. Sometimes I’ll just be sitting there and I’ll have an idea for a melody. So I try to stay tuned to that.

What are you currently working on?

Well, I’ve got an article coming up in Isthmus on Gomeroke. And I did a piece for Madison Magazine on the BDSM scene. It’s a subject that’s close to my heart. I’ve always felt this is worthwhile work to be doing: helping a reader understand that this isn’t something to be threatened or repulsed by. Thirty years ago, homosexuality was largely regarded as pathological or at least slightly distasteful. Now, no enlightened person thinks that. Kink is exactly the same. It looks scary, tawdry and distasteful, but the people who do it, do it lovingly. Not that you wouldn’t find the occasional freak, as in any walk of life. BDSM people are really very kind to one another, expressing themselves erotically in a consensual way.

So, what did you think of the BDSM scene in Madison?

Most of the people I met were extremely charming. I wouldn’t wish the Club Inferno on my worst enemy, for a very simple reason: they allow smoking. You go to the club and three days later your clothes still reek. And there were a lot of guys walking around looking like the ghost of 1969, like they’d taken too many acid trips. Some people there were very poorly dressed. In London, everyone would have spent a thousand pounds on his or her costume.

Why do have parentheses in your last name?

My real name is with one ‘s.’ But when I was around 30, I thought it would be cute to add a second ‘s’ to make it like the classical composer. When I moved to England, I had to go back to the original one ‘s’ because my passport has one ‘s’ and my wife was spelling it with one ‘s.’ So I made the second ‘s’ optional. Hence the parentheses. On a scale of ‘not funny at all’ to my favorite Andy Kaufman moment or Monty Python sketch, it’s a little funny. It makes my byline slightly unusual.

Have something interesting to say about Madison or Dane County? Looking for a place to say it? Dane101 is waiting for you. Contact our editors at the email address: "info @ dane101.com" and we will get you started.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

UW

If he decides to stick around Madison Mendels(s)ohn should consider teaching critical music writing at the UW. In order to stay viable music needs a new Lester Bangs or Dave DiMartino.

Well done.

Kat, this is a great interview. Nice insight on a guy who's caught a lot of flak in his short time in Madison. A bit pretentious? Sure, but what writer isn't? Good stuff.

----
thelostalbatross.blogspot.com

Second read

I'm pretty sure those that were quickest to tar and feather Mendels(s)ohn only read through the article once. I don't agree with everything he wrote, but some of what he said many of us already know, but few actually speak because they are concerned that if you step on the wrong band in Madison you are going to turn off the entire community. Debate and criticism is healthy for any music scene. Plus, he is an old school critic, the kind that gets off on skinning sacred cows. His breed is increasingly hard to find with much of the music writing now coming from bloggers who only write about what they love or what the promoters that give them attention tell them to love. Madison is lucky to have someone who isn't afraid to say it like he really sees it and can start a debate around his words. If all a band hears is accolades, then they aren't going to get any better and they aren't going to take that next step.

Thank you. I should take

Thank you!

I should take this opportunity to correct something: the porn mag he talks about is "Chic," not "Sheik."

Fixed

I fixed it in the story. I tried looking for a cover image this morning, but came up empty, that would be why.

I've met John once at an

I met John once at an audition and have corresponded with him numerous times via e-mail and he is a painfully honest individual. When I say painfully honest I mean that in the best way possible; He doesn't sugar coat what needs to be said. So when the Isthmus article came out and he caught some heat, which was kind of suprising considering he wasn't dumping on the whole scene, he garnered even more of my respect. All around good guy that John Mendels(s)ohn. Thanks for the read Kat.

A man after my own heart!

Madison -- and America! -- needs many more like him! Long may he wave! :-)

Don't give up John!

I agree with these other comments. It IS VERY refreshing to have someone in town who's not trumpeting the same tune, and not just for the sake of being contrary.

John, branch out to the UW if possible ... the Shepherd Express and Journal Sentinel in Milwaukee if you can! Stick around for the coming summer at least.

Thanks for the good interview, and especially a reminder of how "precious" Madison can be. Too true. Lots of people who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, and a "don't rock the boat" mentality.

Re: Don't give up John!

nancyg wrote:
I agree with these other comments. It IS VERY refreshing to have someone in town who's not trumpeting the same tune, and not just for the sake of being contrary.

John, branch out to the UW if possible ... the Shepherd Express and Journal Sentinel in Milwaukee if you can! Stick around for the coming summer at least.

Thanks for the good interview, and especially a reminder of how "precious" Madison can be. Too true. Lots of people who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, and a "don't rock the boat" mentality.

It would be great to see him tackle Summerfest.

I was not one of those

I was not one of those people who complained heavily about the article. And I'm glad to have outside points of view. But I do think that, given his experience, he botched the article big time.

I think what I didn't like about the article was:
1. I found that it was too long and rambled from one thing to another with no cohesion or theme
2. Though he explains now that he was trying to be self-depreciating and not make a big deal out of his credentials, he opens the piece with a real sense of "you ought to know who I am, and I'm important" That just irritated me right off. If he had quickly said that he wrote for Rolling Stone and when (not make a big deal out of it, just stated as fact), I might have given him some sense of respect. Instead he came off as a real ass (especially with that () byline stuff)
3. He slams the midwest in the opening in a way that is very stereotypical "fly-over country" coastal stuff. It made me think right off that his perspective was not very well-rounded or mature. A good writer who wants to win an audience doesn't have to always agree with people or make nice...but maybe you shouldn't open one of your first big pieces with "I kinda figured you people were all hicks in the Midwest" Bad salesmanship.

Those things made it really tough for me to get through the rest of the article. And I REALLY CARE about local music and about writing about local music. Someone else who cared less I'd think wouldn't get far in that article. It just seemed like a dis-service to everyone...including him if he wants to resurrect his writing career.

Re: I was not one of those

Dar wrote:
Though he explains now that he was trying to be self-depreciating and not make a big deal out of his credentials, he opens the piece with a real sense of "you ought to know who I am, and I'm important"

It took me a second read to understand he was being self deprecating. As a Pixies fan who hated his book I was surprised he would even tout that as a positive. Then I reread it and realized he wasn't necessarily touting it as a positive.

Quote:
3. He slams the midwest in the opening in a way that is very stereotypical "fly-over country" coastal stuff. It made me think right off that his perspective was not very well-rounded or mature.

I hate to say it, but Madison is perceived as being in "fly-over country." We are slowly breaking that reputation, but it is a pain in the ass convincing bands that it is worth playing here and convincing the industry to even bother looking at our scene. If you read through the entire article he does have a number of positive things to say about Madison music and expresses that his perception was changed as he explored. Plus, the cover title for the article misrepresented the actual context of the article. He wasn't looking at who was going to be the next big breakout act, he was giving an outsider's perspective of the Madison scene. He suffered from the way Isthmus packaged and presented his piece. Based on this interview it sounds like he would have been more than happy to write the article without even providing a bio.

That said, I moved to Madison from the East Coast, so I may be biased. *wink, wink*

I "slam"[med] the Midwest?

I "slam"[med] the Midwest? Boy, some people really don't get a joke unless you have a line of high-kicking chorines come out waving banners that say "JOKE!!!" You really imagined that I expected Madison to be full of polka bands in Chinese-made liederhosen? And this just in: I chose to live here. Where's the slam in that?
As for stating my...credentials, that whole bit was absent from the original article, but the Isthmus asked me to put it in. I did so with tongue firmly in cheek, but the sad fact is that some people are going to accuse you of self-inflatedness no matter how much you may poke fun at yourself.

I'm just saying it pissed

I'm just saying it pissed many people off, so the delivery wasn't that spot on. I wasn't all that pissed off personally, but it did make me discount the rest of what you had to say.

Maybe I'm dense, but it was not clear to me whether you were serious, joking, or joking but secretly serious. I've heard much worse about the midwest from people who live on the coasts, so it's hard to know.

Anyway...you're a critic. If other people feel like criticizing your work, it seems like that's fair game.

Admittedly, I would not have taken any note at all of who you were unless you had made the introduction that you did and irritated so many people. So I guess it worked. No press is bad press, I suppose.

East Coast relocators

Is there a support group? I could use one.

that damn snow

About the snow and your thoughts of leaving. This has been an unusual winter, twice the snow as per normal. Global warming is going to give us winters like Arkansas, just you wait. Palm trees on State St. Give 'em hell John. The music scene here needs you and more like you.

" THE MUSIC BUSINESS IS A DARK , PLASTIC HALLWAY, WHERE PIMPS & THIEVES RUN FREE , & GOOD MEN DIE LIKE DOGS . THERE'S ALSO A NEGATIVE SIDE ." - Dr. Hunter S. Thompson

Mendels(s)ohn interview

Very nice job.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dd><a> <b> <dl> <dt> <i> <u> <ul><br><p> <div> <u> <object> <strike> <img> <embed> <param>
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text. URLs will automatically be converted to links.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.