Election 2008: Kevin Barrett to debate Rep. Ron Kind? Likely. WTDY talker Sly endorses Barrett? Not so much.
Post by Jesse Russell on 5/15/2008 3:00pm
When I first heard that 9/11 theorist and UW-Madison Lecturer Kevin Barrett was running as a Libertarian for Rep. Ron Kind’s 3rd District congressional seat, I was elated. Not because of any desire one way or the other to see Barrett unseat the congressman, but because it means the race is suddenly much more interesting then it was two weeks ago. Kind already has a competitor in Republican Paul Stark, but it is highly unlikely that Stark can unseat the New Democrat and Free Trader from La Crosse. Kind, who has held the seat since 1997, defeated his most recent Republican challenger in 2006 with 65 percent of the vote. Stark is trying to defeat Kind by tying the incumbent to Democratic Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama. Obama defeated Senator Hillary Clinton in La Crosse County with 58 percent of the vote. On the Republican side La Crosse County went to Senator John McCain by 48 percent, but Mike Huckabee came in a close second with 41 percent of the vote.
With Stark as a non-starter, Barrett injects some much needed carnie magic into the election. Case in point, yesterday Barrett sent out an email alleging:
WTDY talk radio host Sly has endorsed Barrett's candidacy. The endorsement represents another unprecedented breakthrough, since it is the first time a major mainstream talk radio host has endorsed a pro-9/11-truth candidate for public office. The endorsement came on Sly's radio show Friday.
I listened to the segment of Sly’s show where he interviews Barrett and not once does Sly use the words “I endorse Kevin Barrett.†What he does say at the end of the interview, “I am fascinated by your candidacy and I am looking forward to talking to you through out it. Kevin, thanks for coming on with us. Kevin Barrett, the next congressman from the third district of Wisconsin.†Listen here.
Fascination, an endorsement does not make. I contacted Sly to verify Barrett's endorsement. His response:
I'm not making an official endorsement of either candidate, and I was being tongue and cheek during my interview with Mr. Barrett. I was encouraged by Mr. Barrett pledging to hold Rep. Kind's feet to fire about his misguided trade policy. I look forward to hosting a fiery debate between the candidates on my show.
Also in the email from Barrett is the announcement that Kind has accepted Barrett’s challenge to a debate. According to Barrett:
In an unprecedented breakthrough for both the Libertarian party and the 9/11 truth movement, Rep. Ron Kind has agreed to debate his Libertarian challenger for Wisconsin's 3rd District congressional seat.The first Barrett-Kind debate will undoubtedly draw national media attention. It will be the first time a federal office-holder has agreed to debate a leading figure from the 9/11 truth movement. And it is apparently the first time that a major-party incumbent in a three-way race has agreed to debate the third-party challenger rather than the major-party challenger.
Please, zombie Jesus, make this debate happen.
You can listen to the entire Kevin Barrett segment on Sly’s show here. Below are a couple of the policy issues Barrett laid out during the program.
1. “We need a new investigation†into 9-11. He said Kind is “a coward†for not looking farther into the events surrounding September 11, 2001.
2. We should pull out of Afghanistan. “The only reason we went in there was to shore up the heroin business. The Taliban had shut down the $1.5 trillion a year heroin business which is largely run by corrupt elements of our own CIA.â€Â
3. Considers himself a “New Libertarian.†Supports strengthening Social Security and public education.
4. Wants to develop alternative energy sources.
5. Would cut off aid to Israel because as soon as the U.S. does they would “make peace with indigenous Palestinians.â€Â
6. Will lead charge against NAFTA and CAFTA to prevent “North American Union,†abolishment of the U.S. Dollar in exchange for the Euro, and the building of a “NAFTA superhighway across the country to bisect it.â€Â
7. Abortion: States or communities should decide
8. Unclear if he would overturn Roe v. Wade, but if he really thinks states should decide on abortion, Sly points out, he would need to overturn it
9. Second amendment. Strong supporter of Second Amendment and a “well relegated militia†instead of “standing Army†“Americans should be allowed to carry all sorts of firearms including military style firearms.â€Â
10. Congress should subpoena ex-military officers who are part of the “Disclosure Project†to testify on UFOs.
Jesse Russell
Co-Editor
Jesse was born and raised in Connecticut, began blogging in 1997, and moved to Madison in 2003. In 2005, he co-founded dane101 along with Kristian Knutson and Shane Wealti. In addition to helping nearly a dozen contributors run this website he's helped launch various events in the city including What's Your Damage?!, the MadPubQuiz of Awesomeness, the Fire Ball Masquerade, Dane101's Freakin' Halloweekend, and more.

Jesse, Barrett was only a
Submitted by Jon Hendrix on Thu, 2008-05-15 18:56.
Jesse, Barrett was only a lecturer, not a professor, and UW didn't renew his contract. He hasn't taught there in about a year I think.
Also...
Submitted by Emily Mills on Fri, 2008-05-16 09:38.
...he crazy.
But entertaining!
----
thelostalbatross.blogspot.com
Not crazy
Submitted by Jesse Russell on Fri, 2008-05-16 13:12.
I don't think it is fair to call Kevin Barrett crazy. Just like anyone his belief system is based on the facts his personality and mental filters allow.
Maybe a little crazy.
Submitted by Emily Mills on Fri, 2008-05-16 13:31.
Americans should be allowed to carry all sorts of firearms including military style firearms.
----
thelostalbatross.blogspot.com
Okay
Submitted by Jesse Russell on Fri, 2008-05-16 14:06.
Got me there.
Sly endorsed Dr. Barrett in the second segment
Submitted by Galileo on Sun, 2008-05-18 11:39.
I hope this headline can be changed. Dr. Barrett was on the show for a half hour. Sly endorsed Barrett during the second half hour, after Barrett was off the show.
Just because it's not in the Podcast, doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Not according to Sly
Submitted by Jesse Russell on Mon, 2008-05-19 08:09.
If you read the article Sly said he didn't endorse Barrett. It was "tongue and cheek."
I heard Sly say he endorsed
Submitted by Galileo on Mon, 2008-05-19 13:34.
I heard Sly say he endorsed Barrett on the radio. If it were half tongue and cheek that's fine, but Barrett would have no way of knowing that, his campaign could only base their statements on what they heard on the radio.
Someone on Digg has twisted your blog entry for their own agenda:
911 Truther Kevin Barrett runs for Congress, caught in lie
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/911_Truther_Kevin_Barrett_runs_for_Congress_caught_in_lie
Bogus info on Wikipedia entry for Barrett
Submitted by Galileo on Thu, 2008-05-22 14:58.
"On May 14, 2008 Barrett sent an email to supporters claiming to have received the endorsement of WTDY talk radio show host John "Sly" Sylvester". The endorsement claim was later proven to be false.[33]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Barrett
This is totally bogus. I heard Sly say he endorsed Barrett for congress. To say that the claim was "proven to be false" is an outright lie.
Weird
Submitted by Jesse Russell on Fri, 2008-05-23 07:56.
Doesn't really seem wikipedia worthy. Someone with a wikipedia account should edit that out.
As for the content of this post, both Sly and Sly's producer told me it was "tongue-in-cheek." I have no reason to believe Sly is lying to me unless it is a conspiracy and Sly is secretly endorsing Barrett and just doesn't want anyone to know.
I did.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2008-09-10 23:00.
Wikipedia edited at least partially. I can't believe someone would pass off such a biased view of a guy as a valid wiki entry. Oh wait, Fox News is passed off as "news" every day so I guess it's not that much different. Nonetheless, I don't even follow politics and I edited this entry out of sheer principle. Find it hard to believe no one did it sooner. This guy deserves our attention and objectivity. He may not be feeding us info that is undeniably true, but he sure gets us thinking and researching on our own, which I imagine is one of the main goals of his "Truth" campaign.
Post new comment