Worst House In Madison contest "winner" unveiled

Current

IMG_8839-p-tn.jpgRepresentatives from the Student Tenant Union, UW-Madison declared 617 Mendota Ct. as the "winner" of their Worst House In Madison contest for 2008.

Student Tenant Union organizers Jason Wargolet and Joseph Lindstrom spoke at a press conference in front of the "winning" residence, explaining how the combination of lack of needed repairs, an unresponsive landlord, and troubling safety and security concerns earned the Mendota Ct. residence the nod.

"We picked this particular residence because the landlord clearly hasn't invested the necessary resources or time for the upkeep of this apartment, and the price was paid in a threat to the tenant's very safety. We hope students remember this before ever renting from Patrick Properties," said Lindstrom.

Wargolet added, "We hope to let landlords know that if they don't maintain apartments and follow the laws and ordinances that we have here in Madison, it will be noticed and publicly brought to light, and future renters will see that. We hope to cultivate a competetive environment for downtown landlords to provide the highest quality housing possible."

Before leading media representatives through a tour of her apartment, the current tenant, Karley Gifford, described her experience living with mice, a leaky roof, problems with locks and doorknobs, and an inadequate response from her landlord, Patrick Properties, to a pair of recent break-ins.

"I'd say the worst part about living in the Worst House In Madison is sleeping with the lights on because I'm afraid someone's going to come in in the middle of the night," Gifford explained.

Lindstrom noted that the city building inspector reported water damage and falling ceiling tiles, numerous portions of cut and torn linoleum, chipped paint and splintered wood on the walls, and an improperly boarded-up emergency exit door among the apartment's potential code violations.

As the winner of the contest, Gifford received a smattering of gift certificates from local businesses, as well as a visit from Building Inspection.

Click on images to embiggen
IMG_8815-p.jpg
IMG_8839-p.jpg
IMG_8847-p.jpg
IMG_8869-p.jpg
IMG_8877-p.jpg
IMG_8886-p.jpg
IMG_8892-p.jpg
IMG_8893-p.jpg
IMG_8894-p.jpg

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Journalism 101

Phil - Did you make any attempt to contact Patrick Properties? That's pretty basic for a story like this, don't you think? Not that they'd be able to say, "no, the ceiling doesn't leak," but they deserve the chance to either 1) pretend to be sorry about it or 2) give you a "no comment," which is actually worse. If they go with 1, you get to check in with the resident for a follow-up in a few months to see whether the landlord kept their promises.

Point well taken

I really appreciate the feedback, and agree with what you said. I probably would've gotten the "no comment" comment - I guess the State Journal got a hold of the landlord, but then he clammed up for the Herald and Cardinal - but I should've at least tried, since I did get quotes from STU and Gifford.

I'll be honest - I very much prefer to tell stories through images, and wasn't sure whether or not to include the write-up too. I'll keep your comments in mind if I do any future writing. Thanks for the feedback.
_______
CFUCT

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.