The Capital Times: Is change good?
On Feb. 20, New Mexico residents received a shock. The Albuquerque Tribune, a Pulitzer Prize-winning newspaper would cease to publish after Feb. 23 due to a decline in circulation.
The Tribune was one of two Albuquerque newspapers. The Albuquerque Journal and the Tribune had coexisted thanks partially to a joint operating agreement signed in 1933 that allowed the companies to merge advertising and share a press.
Two weeks earlier, The Capital Times newspaper in Madison had announced major changes. Effective April 26, they would no longer publish a newspaper version of their product.
Instead, it would publish two weekly print supplements: a Wednesday publication focused on editorials and news; and a Thursday magazine geared towards entertainment. The main daily focus for The Capital Times will be their website, CapTimes.com.
“You try to explain we’re not dying, we’re just changing formats and we’ll still be there and people look at you funny,†says Judy Ettenhofer, managing editor for The Capital Times about their transformation to the web. “They sort of get it, and they sort of don’t.â€Â
Sue Robinson, a journalism professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and former business reporter for Gannett newspapers agrees.
“My hope is that rather than stepping into some grave, the Cap Times has found an innovative way to shift its focus so that the brand can live on,†says Robinson.
A study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism points a gloomy picture for print publications. Circulation for daily newspapers continues to fall 2.5 percent per year, while Sunday circulation drops 3.3 percent.
Meanwhile, the number of people going online for news on a regular basis continues to grow. The study says that the audience for major news sites is also rising.
According to Ettenhofer, The Capital Times is the first major newspaper to transition most of their resources online.
“It’s exciting for a publication to devote that much to a website,†says Phil Hands, an editorial cartoonist for the Wisconsin State Journal.
The Deal
One reason The Capital Times can make the move to a web-based news source is due to a revenue agreement with the State Journal. The agreement states that both newspapers split profits equally. Ettenhofer admits this gives The Capital Times an advantage other newspapers might not have.
“We can try something experimental and see if we can figure out new ways to generate revenue,†says Ettenhofer. “We are aware of our responsibility to try and help produce revenue.â€Â
But not everyone is convinced the change is good.
Hands says the revenue agreement “holds back both publications.â€Â
“It’s not great for the State Journal,†says Hands. “They’re not under an obligation to ‘make it’ because they’re subsidized.â€Â
Dee Hall, an investigative reporter for the State Journal, worries the push of content to the web might hinder in-depth stories and research.
“Everyone wants instant news these day,†says Hall. “But every hour that an editor or reporter spends posting ‘breaking news’ is an hour they aren’t spending developing sources, doing a probing interview or plowing through piles of documents.â€Â
“We may end up feeding the beast,†says Hall, “while starving the majority of newspaper readers, who get their news from print precisely because it has depth and context.â€Â
Paving the way
Ettenhofer admits they have no one to use as a model when making the change.
“I think what we’re doing is pretty cutting edge,†says Ettenhofer. “There is excitement over the potential and imagining all the different types of content we can offer on the website.â€Â
Robinson agrees.
“I think their future -- as with all newspapers -- depends on how well they can utilize the interactive and multimedia attributes that will come with their new online presence while combining good - and ultimately, profitable - journalistic practices,†she says.
Ettenhofer says that while the local community sees the change as the death of a newspaper, national sources have contacted her voicing their support.
Media institutes such as Poynter have praised the transformation. “You guys may be on the cusp of what the industry will be doing in the future, you may be the start of a trend,†was one response Ettenhofer received. “There will probably be other newspapers that will be doing what you’re doing within a year.â€Â
Robinson, who focuses on new media, agrees.
“They have the opportunity here to be a pioneer,†says Robinson. “I am holding out hope that this will mean a step in the direction of newspapers' resurrection.â€Â
The change prevents The Capital Times from suffering the same demise as the Albuquerque Tribune.
At least for now.




Connecticut
I hope that "ct" isn't the new logo. As someone who moved to Madison from Connecticut all I can think is of Connecticut. Why not TCT?
Now that ain't workin', that's the way you do it...
I'd hazard a guess that most adults she is trying to explain this to aren't so behind the times that they don't "get" what TCT is doing. Here are some reasons why they might be looking at her funny: because essentially their idea of the newspaper is dying; they don't relish the idea of having to get their news from a glowing screen rather than something tangible they can take with them and read over lunch; they are disheartened by the fact that the money talked and many walked (and not all willingly). I really appreciate this piece, Jason. Even though I am a bit of an internet junkie, I am on the fence about the newly envisioned web/weekly Cap Times. I have to hope that it doesn't denigrate the presence of beloved local websites like Dane101, or lure folks away from the widely read Isthmus (though it's obviously trying to make a dent in both demographics). I think that a good newspaper with a decent staff can stay modern and timely within its given parameters. The thing about a newspaper is that once it's printed, the story's out there, no more tweaking or camoflauge-- no editor can say "psssst, we have been getting a lot of angry emails about that story, let's take it down." Sigh. I'm beginning to rant here. I'll stop now.
Judy is a Punk
The reason I would have looked at Judy the way she describes is because I know a few a good writers that do not have jobs anymore because of this. So yeah, to Judy’s perspective the Cap Times may not be “dyingâ€, but as far as I’m concerned, The Cap Times that I know and love is what is “dyingâ€. What a weird and kind of arrogant statement to make on her part.
I also will never look at John Nichols the same way again either.
Point of reference
Marc Eisen's piece is very interesting. It can be read in the most recent issue of Isthmus, but media critic Bob McChesney checks in with Eisen at the following link:
http://www.thedailypage.com/daily/article.php?article=22420
Well...I guess as long as it isn't "The CT" like "The CW." I'm still writing "TCT" in Breakfast Links.
Where Eagles Dare
Didn't Glenn Frey once sing "You Belong to The CT"?
Starship
I think you mean Starship's "We Built This CT"
depth of coverage
I also feel Hall's concerns about the depth of coverage. My hope is that the Capital Times is able to stand tall and say "We don't need to 'me first' because we're an established news institution. We'll publish stories when they're ready, and quality will trump quantity."
Will someone step up?
My question is, when will some group of disenchanted grass-roots journalist types pull together and build a new progressive daily? A co-op maybe or find a big investor and do it up right and go head-to-head with the state journal.
If I had any money, I'd do it. If anybody else does it, I'm in.
Save our CT
The Cap Times had to do something. Afternoon daily newspapers are an outgunned oddity in the era of 24 hour "breaking news" models. It used to be that you could get the news that happened during the day in time for supper and not be "a day behind." That's no longer necessary. Most have been disappearing since the rise of television news.
When you generally have two newspapers in one town or city there is one that is the most widely read, and the other generally operates as the troublemaker. In Chicago, most people read the Tribune. However, the Sun Times is more adept at covering local issues and making the local political forces sweat over that sweatheart deal. I view the WSJ and the Cap Times in the same regard.
The Cap Times is not the first to try something like this, nor will they be the last. Although not exactly what the CT is aiming to do, there are several online only newspapers that do an excellent job. I used to work for one of them called the St. Thomas Source (www.stthomassource.com) about four years ago. It's now considered on par with the daily newspapers and many read it everyday along with the main daily newspaper. When she started, everyone told her it was crazy and career suicide to launch a web-only paper (in the Caribbean no less). Four years and several awards later, it's doing very well.
My point is that unless newspapers want to end up like the music industry, they need to be open to change and new ideas.
I'm hoping the Cap. Times will still attempt to break stories and this isn't the first step in a backhanded attempt to merge the papers (first an insert in the WSJ and a website, then a combined website, etc.).
Whatever CT becomes it can hardly be worse than the new WSJ layout.