
Waiting until 2010 is no compromise when health is the issue
Submitted by Jesse Russell on Thu, 2008-01-10 16:10.
Current | Advocacy
|
Maybe no one told the Public Health Committee that in 2006 the Office of the Surgeon General issued a report detailing the impact of second hand smoke? In case you missed it, I've pulled out two of the many substantial findings:
"Scientific evidence indicates that there is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Breathing even a little secondhand smoke can be harmful to your health."
...and...
"Secondhand smoke exposure causes disease and premature death in children and adults who do not smoke."
We have known this for years and it isn't going to change during the 700 days between now and January 2010. Waiting that long makes absolutely no sense and is unfair to not only the service industry workers of Wisconsin, but also to the bar and restaurant owners in forward moving municipalities that have already banned smoking.
18 states have 100 percent workplace no smoking laws with Oregon, Montana, Utah, and Idaho going 100 percent by 2009 (100 percent does not always include casinos or private clubs). I'm not surprised by this move to delay the smoking ban for an unnecessary second year because after last year's budget debacle I have very little faith that our current crop of elected officials can get anything done in a timely fashion. I do concede that getting it done by 2010 is better than not getting it done at all, but I live in Madison where I can breathe easy whenever I go out. Smoking on Dane101: Six Reasons to Quit in 2008 |










Recent comments
11 hours 38 min ago
12 hours 56 min ago
13 hours 16 min ago
13 hours 35 min ago
14 hours 4 min ago
14 hours 21 min ago
14 hours 23 min ago
14 hours 37 min ago
14 hours 41 min ago
14 hours 50 min ago