Fresh thoughts on the UW admission debate

Current | Campus

uwlogohome.gifState Representative Stephen Nass (R-Whitewater) and UW System President Kevin Reilly, your quarrel is over.

Over the past year, Nass and Reilly have debated the admission standards for the UW System. Recent changes implemented by Reilly and the Board of Regents look at scholarly performance as well as non-academic factors, including "student experiences, leadership qualities, motivation, special talents, status as a non-traditional or returning adult, veteran, and whether the applicant is socio-economically disadvantaged or in a historically underrepresented racial or ethnic group."

Nass has argued that using ethnicity as a factor is ill-advised and possibly illegal. Nass believes there is a possibility that less-qualified minorities are admitted to the UW System, while white Wisconsin students who do better in school are being denied.

Through the heated debate, Governor Jim Doyle is the voice of reason. During his State of the State address, Doyle introduced the Wisconsin Covenant program. Eight-grade students who sign a pledge to finish high school with a B average, stay out of trouble and volunteer in their community are guaranteed a place in the UW system. “I want the university and the state of Wisconsin to say that if you do all that, there will be a place in the UW System for you.”

The Wisconsin Covenant also assists by providing financial resources for students who might not be able to afford higher education. Covenant Scholars have access to grants, scholarships and federal loans.

The cost to the state for the plan is estimated at $10 million a year for financial aid. While there will be an initial hit to the budget, the program should pay for itself in time. Most aid given to students is in the form of loans, which are paid back when a student finishes school.

An advantage of the program is that a more educated public would help to accelerate business growth in the state. A highly educated workforce is desirable to existing companies, and would create a strong base for the formation of new companies. As the people of Wisconsin make more in wages, they will pay more to the state in taxes.

There remains the question of how to proceed with admissions until the first Covenant scholars start college in four years. Until that time, it is important for the UW System to continue on with the admission standards that are in place.

In a recent open letter to David Walsh, chair of the UW Board of Regents, Rep. Nass stated, “The people of Wisconsin would be better served if the UW System worked more aggressively with K-12 School Districts to increase the number of minority high school graduates eligible to apply for admissions to our public universities based on academic performance.” I agree, and urge Rep. Nass along with his fellow members of the State Legislature to pass Doyle’s plan to ensure race is never again used to determine who is in and who is out.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

initial reaction

My biggest thought regarding this concerns the "finish high school with a B average, stay out of trouble and volunteer in their community" point.

What students have the most opportunities and community and economic support to do this? If a student has to work a job on top of going to high school to help support his/her family, does he/she have time to volunteer after school? Is he/she able to devote much time to homework and getting a "B" average?

"Staying out of trouble" is problematic because white students and students of color aren't always judged the same-- a white student who fights may not get in too much trouble ("just boys being boys"), while a black or Latino student may have to face the authorities ("they're all in gangs").

And which communities are equipped with the necessary tools to ensure that students are able to maintain "B" averages? And of course it's never impossible, but some students are going to have to work a hell of a lot harder than others because of school conditions.

Race and class both play huge parts in all this. I'm not saying that the Covenant is a bad idea, not at all; it just raises more questions. How are we as a State addressing school inequalities, residential segregation, poverty and racism, all these other issues that affect our children's ability to succeed?

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.

ethnicity / legacy admissions

If they get rid of ethnicity as a factor they better get rid of legacy admissions too then.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

*
*
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


*

  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dd><a> <b> <dl> <dt> <i> <u> <ul><br><p> <div> <u> <object> <strike> <img> <embed> <param>
  • You can use BBCode tags in the text, URLs will be automatically converted to links
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • You may use [inline:xx] tags to display uploaded files or images inline.